Trap of free trade

Based on globalism free trade - here is not limited to the "goods and services", it also includes the liberalization of the movement of "money (capital)" and "human (workers)," but - by people in developed countries are poverty reduction To go. In particular, in a world where global standard has been established, some products also services,
"I am made anywhere in the country, the same kind of quality."
I become.

Well, "~ to increase the added value, - to fight in the world" who shout the agricultural "reform," but we have argued that such is the reality difficult. In globalism, the most important is for a "price".
Of how, added value, if you say the added value, First please try Anta is doing. By increasing the added value, and tell him from turning over 10 times the price difference, it is mon, such Te.

result of globalism has been progress, or employment from developed countries is lost, or domestic employment will continue to be deprived of foreign immigrants from "cheap labor". Japan, Western Europe, lowers the national real wages of North America, and to poverty reduction, the world is a translation would be "flattened".

All in all, Watakushi both the "globalism" from earlier, but (strictly speaking, "globalism to poor the people of Japan") I've been criticized, they discussed something similar in the United States have occurred.

"Column: the United States in the TPP pay compensation to the free trade
http://jp.reuters.com/article/jp_column/idJPKBN0N40JS20150413?sp=true
Free trade's watchword of the United States government. Toward the Obama administration Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) agreement, and show the willingness to get trade promotion authority (TPA), which is referred to as the "fast track" to leave the trade negotiation authority to the government, it is also a part of the government of tradition . However, according to the place where it shows a series of evidence, if Mitomere full most-favored-nation treatment on trade in developing low-income countries, it is the cost burden of the United States in the often. (Snip)
Economists regard large profits resulting from free trade, cite the comparative advantage theory is a basic principle of classical economics. If if concentrated in the trading partner countries and regions most specialty areas each other, finally to argue with both become rich.
The United States the 19th century, the theory has proven to be a mistake. While export of iron and cotton to Europe, is provided with a high tariff to protect the "underdeveloped" country of industry. The United States until the 1890s was superior to the UK in the most developed industries. And the it was easy goal that can be achieved for the United States, it is because the United Kingdom at the time had been aimed at the realization of pure free trade stubbornly.
Latest research, will help to be considered separately and the partner countries of mutual trade and offshoring on the benefits (business transfer, outsourcing to foreign), the not so partner countries. If the partner country of the trade or offshoring was the developed countries, there is a tendency that the United States of wage rises. However, if developing countries were the opponent, especially wages of proficiency is low workers and moderate workers is reduced.
Decline effect of such wages is not to be limited to the manufacturing industry, also extends to a similar job in another industry. Wages of general in the manufacturing industry is higher than the service sector. However, if the overseas transfer of import and production increases, employment pressure to reduce manufacturing industry strengthened further, resulting in domino effect that workers who lost their jobs to migrate lower than the service sector wage conventional. Thus reduction of wages is the extend to the entire. (Koryaku) "

Although there a long column, and it summarizes the point,

● out inquiries to when economists and economists to defend free trade "comparative advantage theory" does not Spoken in reality. (To betray the country Dell)
● American 19th century, "the free trade was carried out against Europe, imports to the country conducted the" protectionist ". And in the blink of an eye, it was surpassed was a "factory of the world" at the time the United Kingdom
● trade and offshoring between developed countries, but raise each other's salary, when carried out in the developed and developing countries, lowers wages of developed countries of workers
● trade of developed and developing countries, disaster to the "workers of the developed countries'" of offshoring, occurs other than manufacturing.
● pressure drop of developed countries wages, than the overseas relocation of production, increases the influence towards the case to be brought about by imports from developing countries
● now, are you the most impact on the wage decline in developed countries (especially the United States) China
● China's competitive conditions, because it is different from the developed countries, has become a very unfair situation
● China is clear of exploitation competition partner (for developed countries), and now have gone promoting the domestic production of hardware and software

It becomes.

To begin with, the business owners of developed countries to transfer the factory in a foreign country, it is because the people of there is "profitable". Employment of the developed countries of the workers is lost, income business owners that they had earned, investors, workers of the factory have been transferred earlier, and it will be transferred to the consumer. That is, we as it were from investors "equity" are maximized.

Originally, maximization of capital gains rate, referred to as a "technology development investment," "investment in human resources" and "capital investment", it is what should be realized in the investment activities in the country. However, because the increased investment is subject a cost increase,
"If you spend the money on such useless things, Whatever maximize the capital gains rate to transfer the factory in a foreign country."
This is decisive and there is a maximum of the "danger" of the global shareholder capitalism.

Of course, if the transfer of capital to foreign countries, will increase the profit in the short term. That said, for domestic investment tapers, the medium- and long-term technical strength is lost, even more people will continue to poverty reduction.

Developed countries, will continue to gradually developing Kuni-ka. On the contrary, factories and technology in developing countries coming been transferred, you gradually closer to the direction of developed countries.
In the end, the world is flattened, Hail, it is a story of Hail.
, Please pardon ....

Although I'm sorry, Watakushi even as all the other countries of the world has remained poor, Japan is prosperity, I hope that people become rich. Because, Watakushi is a Japanese citizen, it is because it is not a foreign national. Moreover, since not a politician, it is why there is no need to say every clean.

In addition, the current developed countries "to pull down the progress degree" of globalism (When you criticize the globalism, immediately "whether that seclusion!" Or so come simply silly Mr.'re that said, you have wrote), the country Returning to the same route as the "golden quarter of a century," the public is rich, not only the people of developed countries, you will also watered that people in developing countries. The reason, for the demand of developed countries for huge expansion, because it is possible to developing countries goes to export "technology that was developed in the country, the produced products based on the know-how, Service".

If foreign capital is coming to developing countries, and to build a factory, in the model to export to developed countries while Kokitsukai cheap labor, "supply capacity" in the true sense in developing countries is not attached. Or "economic growth" in the correct meaning is the impossible.

China will not understand it. That's why, when you invite foreign capital,
"Ebisugao"
The the show, you are welcome, if you allowed to transfer the technology to the country,
"Fiend face"
Next, it is not to try to expel mercilessly. (Conversely, one that can not be taken shall be taken, but not eviction)

Corporate management who of short-term profit developed countries in pursuit of (especially Japan that was terrible) is completely deceived by the "way" of China, there always was now gone plunged into crisis the security of the country.

In any case, free trade one very, story is not a simple. With the "information" that is written in the book entry only to input to the head,
"TPP is a free trade. And I do it because it is free (serif Heizo Takenaka has actually said to Watakushi remain the same)."
Or,
"Because there is a comparative advantage theory, free trade is always good."
It claims that the childish and the like, those guys that are promoting globalism and TPP is, you will see how "danger or"?